When the going gets tough, the tough get going

December 1, 2015

The 2008 recession reinforced a painful yet critical lesson for all of us: sometimes effective municipal leaders must make fast, tough and painful choices without complete information. We were budgeting for 2010-11, attempting to cope with revenues that fell off the cliff in 2009 and continued to drop with no end in sight.

Our citizens repeatedly rejected sales tax measures before the recession, and they made it clear when the economy crashed that they were in no mood for any tax or fees increase. The year before, we had cut an already lean budget to its bare bones — negotiating compensation take-aways and furlough days for staff, leaving vacant positions unfilled, allowing no inflation adjustments, and deferring even basic maintenance. But now we needed to cut more.

I will never forget the anguish in my tough, old City Manager’s face as he told Department Heads the truth we all knew at his weekly staff meeting. He had just finished an economic briefing from Finance, and knew the end of this disaster was not in sight. We still had some maneuvering room because we had reacted quickly to the recession by preserving reserves and creating savings by freezing vacant positions and deferring new programs. But these measures did not reduce his pain as he looked around the table at his friends and colleagues, and made sure each one understood that no amount of savings in on-going operations could offset the falling revenue.

We were actively dismantling the highly functional and effective city government that he and his team built over twenty years. Key Department Heads had worked beyond normal retirement age, and were proud of the government they had built together over many years. In the last year they had already cut the police resources needed to discourage gang intrusion, recreation programs that had engaged every age group, and the city’s ability to support a healthy local business community. They did not want or expect to end their careers by further taking apart these services and capabilities.

The Finance Department’s revenue division reviewed revenue forecasts one more time, looking for any sign of a bottom to the revenue shortfalls. Management called in their sales and property taxes consultants. Analysts reviewed local revenues possibilities with department teams. When they produced their final forecasts, they knew that they were as accurate as they were ugly.

When the Finance Department issued this year’s departmental budget worksheets at the beginning of the budget process, the City Manager’s cover memo again asked everyone to examine everything they did, and prepare 5% or more in fresh cutbacks. The next few staff meetings were as grim as any I had ever seen. Talk of new initiatives vanished. Somber silence replaced frequently-shared success stories. When asked how their budgets were developing, the Department Heads offered little hope and no silver bullets. They were looking at layoffs, outsourcing, and service cutbacks, while trying to find ways to hold crumbling infrastructure together one more year.

As the department budget milestone date approached, we realized no one had the stomach to go through the normal round of individual meetings and eke out cuts and sacrifices one at a time. Instead, the Department Heads decided to lock themselves in the board room and carve out the cuts needed right then and there.. They would work as one team in the room, as the leaders they were, looking each other in the eye, understanding the sacrifices being proposed, and doing what had to be done.

It was my honor and privilege to serve as staff to those meetings. I took contemporaneous notes, ran the numbers through the budget worksheet, researched and modeled, and sometimes just sat back and watched the all-too-real human drama play out.  My grandpa used to say that “when the going gets tough, the tough get going.” I watched the truth of that old cliche play out:

  • Public Works proposed outsourcing functions that meant he would personally have to lay off staff he had hired, trained and led for 20 years.
  • Library proposed cutting back days and hours, knowing the building was full of both school kids and homeless who would have nowhere else to go.
  • Fire closed a station house in the overnight hours, knowing he gambled with fate and citizen safety.
  • Police cut school resource officers, fully aware of their key role in helping steer at-risk youth away from trouble.


After two harrowing weeks, we had a balanced budget roughed out and ready for the budget team to finalize. The city survived, but the damage was real; we were not the same place we had been two years before.

The history of the Great Recession has not been written yet, but its damage to our civic culture was massive. Over the next year, some directors retired and others moved to new positions in other governments. They had done their duty — keeping the city running and poised to recover when the economy bounced back. In the following years, some services were restored, but the changes in how staff and citizens viewed the city were more permanent.

The immediate effects were everywhere: Trees were not routinely trimmed as they had been for generations. Fourth of July fireworks were cancelled because the Police Department was unable to provide adequate security. Library and recreation program cutbacks sent parents scrambling for after-school alternatives. The Fire Station roof continued to leak. The long-term staff that lost their jobs did not return.

We only avoided even more draconian measures because we had the reserves to fund the transition to a smaller work force over a period of months, enabling us to place many staff into other open positions or provide good severance packages. City policy required future funding streams be in place for all additions to staff, so we did not have the extra burden of disappearing grant funding tied to positions.

Looking back, there were certainly lessons to be learned. Unfortunately, local government’s revenue streams are largely at the mercy of the larger economy, so local leaders have to be vigilant and use every tool to stay alert to the earliest warnings of danger. All governments should have policies in place to maintain prudent financial reserves when times are good. Their planning process should not allow the use of one-time funds for on-going expenses. All decisions should be made with a full understanding of their future-year impacts.

It is critical to arm managers with intelligent forecasts, and realistic budgets based on sound long-term planning. Open communication channels with fellow professionals across the country help everyone rapidly assess changing conditions, and puts local governments in the best possible position to weather major storms and keep the ship of state off the rocks.



Mike McCann moved into government service in Ukiah, then Monterey CA, after beginning his career in corporate (ADP, Wells Fargo Bank, Blue Shield of CA), not-for-profit (Blue Shield of Ca, Mendocino Private Industry Council), and start-up accounting. For the last 20 years, Mike has been hands-on with budget, financial reporting and accounting operations, including City budgets and CAFRs. He holds a B.S.  in Accounting from SJSU and M.S. in Instructional Technology from  CSUMB.

Contact Mike with questions or comments at .

Category: Government Finance

Related Posts

Government Finance
Rescue Plan Recognizes Need for ‘Resilient Infrastructure’ for Local Governments
Government Finance
Modern Fund Accounting Software And How It Makes Life Easier for Government Accountants
Government Finance
3 Tips from Leaders Adapting to The ‘New Normal’ for Government Budgeting